Compliance

Creating AI governance evidence auditors can use

How to turn AI policy decisions, runtime events, and red team findings into reviewable evidence.

Compliance7 min readRisk and Compliance

Evidence Must Be Specific

Auditors need more than policy documents. They need proof that controls operated: what was inspected, which policy applied, what decision was made, and how exceptions were handled.

Decision Logs

Capture timestamp, system, user or role, data class, policy, decision, severity, and remediation link. Avoid storing unnecessary sensitive content when metadata can prove control activity.

Testing Evidence

Red team evidence should show scenario, result, risk rating, owner, fix, and retest outcome. This connects assurance testing to operational remediation.

Executive Views

Summaries should show coverage, trends, outstanding risk, and business impact. Evidence should support both technical review and governance decisions.

More Resources

Continue exploring AI security thinking.

Guide

9 min read

The enterprise guide to AI agent runtime security

A practical security model for agents that retrieve context, reason over data, call tools, and act across business systems.

For CISO, Head of AI, Security Engineering

Executive Brief

8 min read

How CISOs can govern workforce AI without slowing adoption

Policy patterns for shadow AI discovery, prompt DLP, app governance, and employee enablement.

For CISO, CIO, Risk and Compliance

Research Note

10 min read

Red teaming RAG systems for poisoned context and over-disclosure

Testing approaches for retrieval abuse, source trust, sensitive context leakage, and model response drift.

For Security Engineering, AI Product Teams

Request a Demo

Secure the AI your enterprise runs on.

See how Kavalan helps security and AI teams govern workforce AI, protect agentic systems, and continuously validate GenAI risk.

Request a Demo Explore Platform